{"id":15715,"date":"2016-02-25T21:26:14","date_gmt":"2016-02-25T20:26:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.abingdonblog.co.uk\/?p=15715"},"modified":"2016-02-25T21:26:14","modified_gmt":"2016-02-25T20:26:14","slug":"local-plan-hearings-part-2-by-hester","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.abingdonblog.co.uk\/?p=15715","title":{"rendered":"Local Plan Hearings \u2013 Part 2 – By Hester"},"content":{"rendered":"

Hester attended 2 more sessions of the Local Plan Examination \u2013 one on the \u201cFive-year housing supply\u201d and one on infrastructure issues. The key points were:
\n\"Local
\n1 In order to approve the Plan, the Inspector has to be satisfied that it will genuinely meet what is known as the \u201cObjectively Assessed Need\u201d (OAN) for housing in the area over the next 5 years. There are some people who challenge the OAN figures for this area, but the Inspector has to work with the ones that have been laid down.
\n\"Local
\n2 Our area has been identified as nationally significant for economic growth \u2013 with very ambitious plans for new jobs in the \u201cScience Vale\u201d area (Culham, Milton Park, Harwell etc) so we are required to show that there will be adequate housing for all these new people. There was a debate as to whether job growth was really likely to be as fast as predicted, but there was a certain amount of \u201cchicken and egg\u201d to the discussion \u2013 employers report that it is difficult to recruit here because suitably-priced housing is in short supply\u2026 Interestingly, at the sessions I attended, there was little mention of the Vale having to help Oxford City meet their housing needs.
\n\"Local
\n3 Both the Vale and the developers were adamant that if the Plan is approved, the houses on the various sites can be delivered in the required timescales, but some of those present were doubtful, largely because of the cumulative effect of all the sites on for example the ability of the Vale to process planning applications and of the builders to obtain manpower and materials.
\n\"Local
\n4 The infrastructure discussion was depressing from an Abingdon perspective. The good news is that the plans for the two North Abingdon sites include provision for a Primary School and a \u201cLocal Centre\u201d (which presumably could be a Community Centre, Health Centre or whatever is deemed necessary) although I did not hear a date for those. There is also reasonable provision for footpaths, cycle paths and bus stops. However, house building is scheduled to start in 2018 with about 500 due to be built by 2021: however that is the earliest date mentioned for the Lodge Hill interchange and other considerably later dates were also mentioned. Since building on the Radley and Kennington developments will be going on at the same time, that does not bode well for traffic in the next few years.<\/p>\n

5 While it does seem pretty certain that the new slip roads will be built \u2013 eventually \u2013 other proposed improvements to the A34 in this area (widening, addition of a bus lane etc) sound unlikely, largely because the County Council favour an alternative approach involving a new road from the Didcot northern ringroad to Culham \u2013 including a new river crossing. They believe that, as well as linking up the key Science Vale sites it will also reduce traffic using the A34 north bound by providing a link from Milton interchange to Culham and places to the East of Oxford. Since presumably this will be largely funded by Science Vale and Local Enterprise Plan money there is a perception that it is more achievable than the A34 improvements.<\/p>\n

At present the \u201cNorth Abingdon\u201d sites are actually in Sunningwell and Radley parishes, but the plan is for the boundary to be moved so they are in Abingdon.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Hester attended 2 more sessions of the Local Plan Examination \u2013 one on the \u201cFive-year housing supply\u201d and one on infrastructure issues. The key points were: 1 In order to approve the Plan, the Inspector has to be satisfied that it will genuinely meet what is known as the \u201cObjectively Assessed Need\u201d (OAN) for housing […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[25],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-15715","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-building-work"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.abingdonblog.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15715","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.abingdonblog.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.abingdonblog.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.abingdonblog.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.abingdonblog.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=15715"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.abingdonblog.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15715\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.abingdonblog.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=15715"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.abingdonblog.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=15715"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.abingdonblog.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=15715"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}